What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.



They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices.  Proteck'd Emf Clothing  are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
how to block radiation  for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

Although  how to block radiation  may sound like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.